Free The Open Group OGEA-101 Actual Exam Questions - Question 4 Discussion

Makes sense to rule out A since Implementation Strategy focuses more on the how-to of execution, not governance handoff. The Transition Plan (C) seems right for ensuring governance is part of that phase shift. C

I get why B looks good, but I think D fits better here. A Migration Plan usually covers moving from the current state to the future state, including how governance frameworks adapt through the transition. It’s broader than just a handoff and ensures governance stays aligned as everything shifts. So, D seems like the more complete fit for ensuring smooth governance during implementation, not just setting up governance or mapping steps like B or C suggest.

B/C? I see why the Transition Plan (C) works since it maps out the handover, but the Implementation Governance Model (B) seems more targeted. It explicitly sets up how architecture governance continues during implementation, so it’s not just about moving phases but making sure governance is active and effective throughout. The plan alone might not guarantee the right governance structures are in place.

Option C makes sense since a Transition Plan outlines all the necessary steps to move between phases, which should include handing off governance responsibilities smoothly. It’s about managing that entire shift, not just governance itself.

B imo, because an Implementation Governance Model specifically defines how governance is maintained during implementation, not just the overall transition steps. It’s more focused on ensuring architecture governance continues properly.

I think C makes the most sense since a Transition Plan would cover moving from one phase to another, including governance. But is that always enough to guarantee smooth architecture governance?