Free PMI PMP Actual Exam Questions - Question 10 Discussion
master has not scheduled sprints for three packages on the critical path, which is going to cause the
schedule performance index (SPI) to trend toward 0.90 the following month.
What should the project manager do first?
C seems right, gotta know what’s off with the sprint priorities first.
C/D? Gotta confirm scrum master’s understanding before escalating.
Makes sense to check sprint priorities first, so C.
C/D? Asking the scrum master why irrelevant sprints are happening (C) helps uncover if there’s a misunderstanding, but contacting the sponsor for deadline changes (D) might be premature without that info.
Maybe D fits here. If the schedule’s slipping and critical sprints aren’t started, getting sponsor buy-in for a new date might be the quickest fix before shaking up current sprints.
Option A seems smart—it’s about checking if there’s some scheduling flexibility before pushing for immediate changes, which might disrupt the flow unnecessarily. Better to analyze SPI trends first.
I think option A could be worth considering too. Evaluating the SPI trend might help understand if there's any slack to adjust sprint scheduling before making drastic changes like suspending sprints. Could that be more proactive?
Maybe C is best, gotta understand why work not on critical path is prioritized first.