Free PMI-ACP Actual Exam Questions - Question 1 Discussion
daily coordination meeting, the lead developer reports they cannot complete the stories for this
iteration because the project director requested a document detailing all testing planned for the
solution. The team lead met with the project director to discuss alternatives but insists they need the
detailed plan by the end of that week. The team lead advises the lead developer to continue coding.
What should the team lead do next?
A/C? Starting with the test manager’s input (C) makes sense, but if their capacity is low, negotiating the scope (A) can reduce delays. Jumping to escalation (B) feels too early without these steps.
B might be needed if negotiations fail, but testing first (C) seems smarter now.
C imo, knowing exactly how long the test plan will take helps make smarter calls. Without that info, negotiating or escalating feels a bit premature. Better to have data first.
A/C? Option A could help by narrowing the testing doc’s scope, making it more manageable. But checking with the test manager first (C) might give a clearer picture of how long the document will really take, and if it’s feasible to meet the deadline. That info could also support any negotiation with the project director. So maybe start with C to gather facts, then push for A based on what you learn.
A imo, cutting down the testing doc scope sounds like the quickest fix here.
A. It feels like pushing this all the way up to execs (option B) might be overkill at this stage. Trying to negotiate directly with the project director to limit the testing doc's scope seems more practical and keeps things moving without escalating unnecessarily. It’s a straightforward way to reduce the bottleneck and keep the dev team focused on coding.
A/B? Both seem like solid moves-either try to limit the scope of the testing doc or get higher ups involved due to timeline risks. Not sure which fits better here.