Free Microsoft PL-600 Actual Exam Questions - Question 13 Discussion

A vs D? I’m thinking A because syncing identities usually covers most scenarios without the hassle of setting up federation. Federation (D) could be overkill unless there’s a strong existing need or infrastructure for it. B and C seem more about tenant management than directly solving authentication challenges. Without clear signs that they want separate tenants or already have federation, syncing identities looks like the straightforward approach here.

If the company already uses Office 365, option B makes sense to keep users under one tenant without extra setup. Creating a new tenant (C) feels like extra work unless isolation is needed. Thoughts on that?

It’s A for me. If the company already uses on-prem Active Directory, synchronizing identities to Azure AD keeps things simple and consistent across services. Federation (D) adds complexity unless they already have that setup, which the question doesn’t confirm. B and C don’t really tackle authentication directly—they’re more about tenant management, which isn’t what the question’s focusing on. Synchronization covers both user management and seamless sign-on well enough without extra federation overhead.

I’m going with A here. Synchronized identities typically make user management easier since they sync on-prem AD with Azure AD, which is common for Dynamics 365 setups. D sounds more complicated and usually needs existing federation infrastructure, which isn’t mentioned. So A feels more straightforward and practical.

D feels right since federated identities suit complex setups.