Free Microsoft Fundamentals MS-900 Actual Exam Questions - Question 5 Discussion
DRAG DROP A furniture distribution company uses Microsoft 365. The company would like to optimize employee interaction In Microsoft Teams company wide You need to determine a solution. 
I get why C is popular, but I’m wondering about scalability. If the company grows really fast, org-wide teams might get cluttered or overwhelming. Maybe option D could give more control by grouping employees strategically instead of everyone in one team. That might actually help optimize interactions by making chats more relevant rather than just throwing everyone together. Could be worth considering if they want a more manageable approach long term.
Option C makes sense since it instantly connects everyone in a single team.
I’m thinking option C is the way to go too. Org-wide teams automatically include everyone, so it cuts down on the hassle of manually adding people and helps make sure no one’s left out. Options like A or B seem more about permissions or controlling access, which isn’t really about boosting interaction. D might involve extra setup or policies, but C just makes the team instantly inclusive, which is key here.
Option C seems better since org-wide teams auto-add users, boosting interaction.
I’d go with option D here. The question is about optimizing interaction in Teams, and setting up org-wide teams makes it easier for everyone to be connected without manual invites. Other options seem more about managing apps or configuring specific policies, which won’t have as broad an impact on communication across the entire company. This way, all employees get a shared space from the start, making collaboration smoother.
C