Free Microsoft Teams MS-700 Actual Exam Questions - Question 13 Discussion

Question No. 13

SIMULATION Task 9 You need to deploy the Microsoft Viva Connections app to Teams and install the app as the first item on the app bar of the Teams client for all users.

US
OB
Osama B.
2026-02-21

For preventing communication between Department! and Department, I’d say Sensitivity Labels make more sense than Communication Compliance since labels can control who accesses what, effectively isolating teams. Communication Compliance is more about monitoring and alerts, not blocking chats outright. For the offensive language alert, Communication Compliance fits perfectly because it’s designed to flag policy violations like bad language during chats. So, Sensitivity Labels for the blocking part and Communication Compliance for the alerting part seems like a solid fit based on their core funct

0
JF
Jason F.
2026-02-17

For blocking communication between Department! and Department, I’m thinking Teams policies or app permission policies outside Purview might work better since Purview focuses more on data governance, not chat restrictions. Sensitivity Labels mainly control access to content but don’t prevent chatting outright. On the offensive language part, Communication Compliance fits perfectly since it’s designed to monitor and alert on policy violations in messages. So for the two parts, definitely Communication Compliance for language monitoring, and maybe something outside Purview for preventing cross-te

0
JF
Jason F.
2026-02-11

For blocking communication between Department! and Department, I’m thinking Sensitivity Labels would fit best since they can restrict access and sharing based on label policies. Communication Compliance doesn’t actually stop chats; it just monitors and alerts. And for detecting offensive language, Communication Compliance makes sense as it’s designed to flag policy breaches in Teams chats. So putting it together, Sensitivity Labels for blocking cross-team chats and Communication Compliance to alert on language seems like the right combo here.

0
PL
Peter L.
2026-01-24

I agree that Communication Compliance is the go-to for spotting offensive language, so that part’s clear. For stopping Department! and Department from chatting, another angle is using Teams’ built-in tenant or team-level policies, like app permission policies or messaging policies, but since those aren’t listed, Sensitivity Labels seem to be the best fit here. They can apply restrictions on who can access or interact with content, effectively isolating teams. So I’d pick Sensitivity Labels for blocking cross-team communication and Communication Compliance for monitoring language.

0
NQ
Naveed Q.
2026-01-21

I don’t think Communication Compliance can block chat between groups—that’s more about monitoring and alerting. Sensitivity Labels are designed to control access and can prevent communication between specified teams by applying restrictions. For spotting offensive language, Communication Compliance is made exactly for that kind of monitoring and alerting. So, Sensitivity Labels for blocking communication and Communication Compliance for offensive language alerts makes the most sense here.

0
MV
Mark V.
2026-01-18

Blocking communication between groups is usually handled by Sensitivity Labels, so that's probably the choice for the first part. For offensive language alerts, Communication Compliance fits perfectly since it monitors chats.

0
MV
Mark V.
2026-01-16

For blocking communication between the two teams, I think Communication Compliance is the feature. For detecting offensive language, Policy matches that too. Seems like the right combo here.

0