Free Microsoft Dynamics MB-330 Actual Exam Questions - Question 5 Discussion
overall labor must be added to a costing sheet for each item.
The company also requires that the labor and overhead costs be calculated independently and then
rolled up to a total amount.
Which three actions should you perform to meet the requirements?
Select all answers that apply.
Guessing B, C, and E here too. Breaking down overhead and labor with subnodes (B) fits the need to keep them separate, plus defining rates on cost groups (E) matches how percentages are usually set.
Maybe B, C, and E—rates usually sit on cost groups, not nodes.
B. Creating indirect cost subnodes keeps labor and overhead separate, which fits the requirement. D feels off since rates usually go on cost groups, so E is a better bet for defining rate amounts.
Option B makes sense since indirect cost subnodes help separate overhead and labor. Also, Option C is necessary to format the costing sheet properly. Option D seems less likely because rates usually go on cost groups, not nodes.
It’s B, C, and E for me. Creating indirect cost subnodes (B) is key since you need to track labor and overhead separately before combining them. Defining the costing sheet format (C) lets you set up how those costs show on the sheet, and defining rate amounts on the cost group (E) handles applying the percentages needed. Options A and D feel less relevant because they don’t clearly support the independent calculation and final roll-up as the question demands.
A/E? Setting cost group type as a node (A) might help organize the structure, and defining rate amounts on the cost group (E) handles the percentages. B isn't necessarily required if indirect subnodes aren’t explicitly mentioned as mandatory.
It’s B, C, and E because indirect subnodes separate costs, and E applies rates correctly.
B/C/E for sure. The question says labor and overhead costs must be calculated independently and then rolled up, so using indirect cost subnodes (B) helps separate those. Defining costing sheet format (C) lets you control how those costs show up together. Defining rate amount on the cost group (E) matches the requirement for percentages applied to overhead and labor. Options A and D seem off since selecting cost group type as a node or defining rate amount on node don't really fit the need to roll up separately. So I’d drop A and D right away.