Free Microsoft GH-200 Actual Exam Questions - Question 14 Discussion

Pretty sure the runners do support Linux, Windows, and macOS, so C seems solid. Also, GitHub usually offers a range of Linux distros on runners, making D a good call too. C and D.

Makes sense to rule out B since caching isn't automatic. Also, E sounds off because GitHub offers free runners for public repos. C and D look solid as they cover OS support and distros well. C and D.

Not B, because caching isn’t automatic across runs; C and D fit better.

Maybe C and D. C is solid since GitHub-hosted runners definitely support Linux, Windows, and macOS. D makes sense too because they offer multiple Linux flavors like CentOS, Fedora, and Debian. I’d skip A because I think the automatic patching mainly covers the runner app, not the full OS. B and E don’t feel right—file-system caching doesn’t happen automatically between runs on these runners, and you don’t always need a payment method for private repos depending on your plan.

Maybe D and C here. GitHub supports multiple Linux distros including those listed, plus main OS families. Not sure about automatic patching of the OS itself, so A feels risky.

A/C for sure, since they patch runner and support main OS families.

A and C, since GitHub manages runner updates and supports those three OS types officially.

Maybe A and C here. GitHub runners definitely handle updates automatically, and the multi-OS support is well-known. D seems risky since Fedora and CentOS might not be officially supported.

B imo, caching isn’t automatic across runs without explicit setup, so that’s out. C makes sense since GitHub clearly supports Linux, Windows, and macOS runners officially.

It’s A and C for sure.