Free Juniper JN0-683 Actual Exam Questions - Question 5 Discussion
be less than 50 switches: however, it could scale up to 250 switches over time supporting 1024
VLANs. You are still deciding whether to use symmetric or asymmetric routing.
In this scenario, which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)
Maybe C and D. Symmetric routing usually handles bigger scale better, which fits the scenario. Plus, asymmetric routing is known to do the routing on the egress switch, so D makes sense too.
Noticed some debate on scaling and IRB use. I think C and D work best here. Symmetric routing is generally better for scaling large numbers of VLANs, which fits the scenario’s future growth. And D matches how asymmetric routing offloads routing to the egress switch, keeping it simpler on the ingress side. A feels off because symmetric routing doesn’t necessarily need an extra VLAN for each VRF, just IRBs configured properly. So, C and D seem like the stronger picks from what I understand.
Probably A and D. Symmetric routing needing an IRB per VRF is a known fact, and asymmetric routing doing the routing on the egress switch aligns well with how traffic flows in that mode.
It’s A and D. Symmetric routing does require an IRB interface per VRF, so A fits. And asymmetric routing definitely handles routing at the egress switch, which matches D perfectly.
Maybe C and D make the most sense here. Symmetric routing is known for better scalability, which fits the potential growth to 250 switches and over 1000 VLANs. Also, asymmetric routing usually means the routing happens at the egress switch, so D fits with that logic. I’d skip A because not all switches might support the IRB interfaces needed for symmetric routing, and B seems off since transit VNIs in asymmetric routing can actually complicate monitoring.
It’s C for sure since symmetric routing handles scaling better. Also, D makes sense because asymmetric routing does all the routing at the egress switch, which fits that model.
Symmetric routing does scale better for large VXLAN setups, so C.
C imo, because symmetric routing reduces flooding and supports larger scale. D also makes sense since asymmetric routing forwards traffic only on the egress switch, helping simplify things.
Maybe C and D? But does the question specify if the traffic patterns are mostly east-west or north-south? That could affect the routing choice here.