Free Juniper JN0-105 Actual Exam Questions - Question 11 Discussion
Referring to the exhibit, OSPF has three export policies that match different static route prefixes. The
10.10.10.0/24 static route does not match any terms in the policyl routing policy.
What happens next in this scenario?
D, since no match in policyl means immediate rejection there, no fallback.
Not sure if the policies are chained or separate here. If they’re separate, maybe the route gets checked against all three policies instead of being rejected immediately by policyl? That could change things.
It’s D, because if policyl doesn’t match, the route is rejected there without moving on.
It’s C because if the route doesn’t match any term in policyl, it hits the default action, which usually rejects the route. The other policies don’t apply since the question implies policyl handles that prefix first.
A/B? The question says there are three export policies, so maybe if the first one doesn’t match, it tries the next. That would mean 10.10.10.0/24 gets evaluated by policy2 or policy3 before being rejected.
Guessing C since unmatched routes usually get rejected by default.
Could it be that the route falls through to policy3 after policyl doesn’t match?
C imo, since none of the terms match, the default action in a routing policy is usually to reject the route, so it won’t be imported into OSPF.
Looks like the 10.10.10.0/24 route doesn’t match any terms in policyl, so it should be rejected by the default routing policy. So, answer C makes the most sense here.