Free CompTIA Server+ SK0-005 Actual Exam Questions - Question 4 Discussion
Implemented to increase security against a potential insider threat?
It’s D. Since the system is alt-gapped, physical security measures like a Faraday cage can block wireless signals and prevent data leaks or remote access attempts from insiders trying to exfiltrate info. The question hints at highly sensitive data, so stopping any wireless communication is key. Options like MFA or SIEM are good but won’t stop a trusted insider with physical access from using radios or other devices to leak info. A Faraday cage adds a strong physical barrier that complements existing controls.
A/E? Two-person integrity prevents a single insider from making changes alone, while MFA adds another layer by requiring multiple factors to access. Both together could really tighten security here.
It’s A. Two-person integrity adds a layer where no single insider can act alone, which directly counters insider risks better than MFA or SSO that focus more on access control than collusion prevention.
A/E? Two-person integrity makes sense because it requires two people to approve actions, which can stop insiders from doing stuff alone. MFA also helps by making sure someone can’t just log in easily, even if credentials leak. Not sure how the Faraday cage fits here since it’s more about blocking signals than insider threats. Anyone else think SIEM could be useful for monitoring suspicious activity internally? This one feels a bit tricky because each option kinda improves security differently.