Free CompTIA CloudNetX CNX-001 Actual Exam Questions - Question 9 Discussion
causing unscheduled outages. Which of the following best mitigates this risk?
B imo, because having the author’s code reviewed directly tackles mistakes before they hit production, especially if CI/CD isn’t fully set up yet. It’s a simple step that can catch errors early.
D, automation in CI/CD ensures consistent checks before deployment.
It’s B for me. Adding review and approval steps to CI/CD (D) is great but if the issue is real-time errors slipping through, just automating won’t catch bad logic unless someone actually double-checks the changes first. Enforcing code review by the author means a fresh pair of eyes sees the change before anything happens, which directly cuts down on risky mistakes. Also, D assumes a solid CI/CD setup already in place, which the question doesn’t confirm. So B feels like a more immediate and reliable fix given the info.
Good point about existing processes, but D seems stronger since it automates checks and approvals, reducing human error. Adding manual review alone (B) might still let stuff slip through. D
Does the question specify if the team already uses CI/CD pipelines or code reviews? That might affect which option is best to reduce outages from IaC changes.