Free CompTIA CloudNetX CNX-001 Actual Exam Questions - Question 14 Discussion
the company needs to achieve a high level of reliability and high availability for the connection
between its data center and the cloud provider. Which of the following solutions best meets the
requirements?
It’s C because relying on two different suppliers for Direct Connect avoids vendor lock-in and single points of failure, which is crucial for meeting strict reliability and availability requirements.
B/C? If the VPN backup is reliable enough, B’s simpler setup might be enough for high availability. But if the regulations are strict about avoiding any single vendor risk, C seems safer with two different suppliers.
I think eliminating D makes sense since VPNs alone might not meet high availability for critical data center connections. Option C looks solid with two suppliers to avoid single points of failure. C
Maybe B—Direct Connect plus VPN gives both dedicated and backup routes for reliability.
D imo, VPN tunnels can be pretty reliable with automatic failover and encryption, plus using a transit gateway simplifies managing multiple connections. It’s not as costly as double Direct Connect but still solid for high availability.
B/C? I get why C looks solid with two Direct Connects from different suppliers for max redundancy. But B also makes sense since you get a primary dedicated line plus an independent VPN backup over the internet, which can kick in if the Direct Connect fails. Given regulatory needs, having a quick failover without relying on a second provider might be easier to manage and audit. Plus, VPN backup is usually faster to set up than a whole second Direct Connect. It depends on how strict the uptime requirements are and the budget, but B feels like a balanced approach.
Maybe B works too since it combines a dedicated line with an internet VPN backup, covering both speed and failover. It’s a common hybrid approach when full multi-provider Direct Connect isn’t feasible.
It’s C for me. Two Direct Connects from different providers reduce the risk of a single point of failure, offering better redundancy than relying on VPN fallback, which might have latency and security concerns.
It’s B for me. Having Direct Connect plus a VPN fallback over the internet gives both dedicated line speed and an automatic backup if Direct Connect goes down. More practical for compliance.
This one’s gotta be C. Multiple Direct Connects with different suppliers sounds like the best bet for reliability and availability.