Free CompTIA CloudNetX CNX-001 Actual Exam Questions - Question 11 Discussion
host the APIs. During peak hours, the company notices a spike in usage that results in network
communication speeds slowing down for all customers. The management team has decided that
access for all customers should be fair and accessible at all times. Which of the following is the most
cost-effective way to address this issue?
It’s C because throttling controls usage per customer, keeping access balanced without extra infrastructure.
It’s C for me. Throttling ensures no single customer can overload the system, so everyone gets fair access without needing to throw more money at extra VMs. Increasing VMs (B) can get pricey and might not solve fairness if some users still abuse the system. Also, changing MTU (D) won’t help with fairness or slowdowns caused by too many requests. An allow list (A) could block some users but isn’t really “fair” access. So throttling is the most cost-effective way to keep things balanced during peak times.
Increasing the number of VMs (B) might seem like a straightforward fix, but it could get expensive quickly and doesn’t guarantee fairness if some customers keep hogging resources. Throttling (C) actually makes more sense because it limits each user’s rate, ensuring everyone gets a fair share without constantly scaling up infrastructure. Also, increasing MTU (D) usually won’t help with this kind of congestion; it’s more about packet size, not traffic volume. Allow lists (A) would restrict access, which goes against the requirement that all customers should always have access. So cost-wise and f
It’s C again because throttling is designed to control user requests and keep things fair, unlike B which just adds more resources without fixing the root fairness issue.
It’s C because throttling directly limits each user's usage, preventing any single customer from hogging bandwidth during peak times without needing extra VMs or complex configs.
C. Throttling controls how much each user can consume, so everyone gets a fair share without extra hardware costs. Adding more VMs (B) might be costly and not guaranteed to solve fairness.
Option C makes the most sense here. Throttling ensures fair usage by limiting each customer's API calls, so no one hogs all the bandwidth during peak times. It’s also cheap compared to adding more VMs or fiddling with MTU settings that probably won’t fix the fairness issue.