Free Cisco CCNA 200-301 Actual Exam Questions - Question 7 Discussion

B. From what I remember, 5 simultaneous users is the cap to keep the controller responsive and secure. More than that starts causing interface lag or session drops. It’s definitely not as low as 2, and 8 or 9 seems too high given typical hardware limits. The GUI isn’t designed for a big admin crowd at once.

Option B, since 5 feels like a practical cap to avoid performance hits.

A/D? Two seems too low for any practical admin task, but nine feels excessive and unsupported by official docs I’ve seen. Five is a common middle ground, but some sources say eight is possible on certain versions.

D imo, the number 9 feels way too high for simultaneous users on AireOS GUI. From my experience, it’s often capped around 5 to prevent performance hits or admin conflicts. I’m ruling out A since 2 sounds too restrictive, especially for enterprise setups where multiple admins might need access. So, B seems like the sweet spot that matches what I’ve seen in real environments—enough for a few admins without risking overload.

It’s definitely not as low as 2, since I’ve managed to have more than two admins logged in before without kicking anyone off. Also, the higher numbers like 8 or 9 seem way too much for the typical AireOS GUI limits I’ve seen in practice. So between A and B, I’d go with B because the system usually allows a handful of simultaneous sessions, and 5 fits that scenario best. The question probably sticks to the standard max sessions most controllers support, which is usually around 5.

A/B? I remember reading somewhere it's a pretty low number, like 2 or 5 max. 8 or 9 feels too high for simultaneous GUI sessions on AireOS.

Does anyone know if this limit changes with the controller model or software version? The question doesn’t specify which AireOS version or hardware.