Free Cisco CCNA 200-301 Actual Exam Questions - Question 2 Discussion

Another angle: notice level messages are often used for normal but significant events. A certificate expiration (D) would usually trigger a warning or error, not just a notice. TCP or ICMP events (A and B) tend to be logged at lower levels unless there’s a problem. Interface line status changes (C) are commonly logged as notices since they’re important but not critical, so C still feels right here. Could the term “notice level” vary by device, or is it generally accepted to mean something like an interface status update?

I agree that interface changes usually trigger notice messages. Plus, TCP and ICMP events are typically logged at info or debug levels, so C feels like the best fit here.

A/D? I don’t think TCP teardown (A) or certificate expiry (D) usually get notice-level messages; they’re either info or warning/error. An interface status change (C) makes more sense for a notice.

Maybe C on this one. Interfaces going up or down are definitely important events that routers log to syslog at a notice level since it’s not an error but still something you want to track. TCP connections opening or closing don’t usually trigger notice level messages, more like debug or info. Certificate expiry would probably be a warning or error, not just notice. So the interface change feels like the best fit here.

Maybe A here, since tearing down a TCP connection is notable but not an error, so it fits the notice level better than interface changes which might be info or warning.

A/D? Notice level usually signals normal but significant events, like connections closing (A), not errors like cert expiry (D). Interfaces changing status feel more like info or warning.

Maybe C, seems most related to status changes over the others.