Free Cisco 500-220 Actual Exam Questions - Question 14 Discussion

Maybe C here. Since WAN 2 is tied to the "Conf" performance class and assuming it's up, the MX might just route WebEx traffic there regardless of the SLA thresholds being fully met. The question says the MX has a full tunnel, so it should honor the monitored status more than just primary or load balancing. WAN 1 being primary doesn’t seem to matter for this specific traffic type if WAN 2 is available and healthy. That makes D less likely since load balancing usually happens when no clear preference is set by performance or policy.

Option A seems right since WAN 2 has the performance class preference for WebEx traffic.

It’s A because WebEx traffic prefers WAN 2 with the “Conf” SLA met, not just primary link.

Not B, since primary uplink alone doesn’t guarantee WebEx traffic preference. Given the full tunnel and SLA checks, traffic likely follows performance policies, making A more plausible than simple load balancing or just WAN status.

Maybe D here. If the MX has a full tunnel and both WANs are active, it tends to load balance traffic unless there's a strong SLA or performance class forcing preference. The exhibit hints at some performance monitoring but doesn't clearly show WebEx tied specifically to WAN 2 with strict thresholds, so it might just split traffic across both links for efficiency. Without explicit SLA rules for WebEx traffic, load balancing feels like the default behavior.

A/D? If performance class thresholds are set, WebEx might prefer WAN 2 per A, but without strict SLA, load balancing as in D could happen. The config details really matter here.

A