Free Cisco 350-701 Actual Exam Questions - Question 11 Discussion
What are two advantages of using Cisco Any connect over DMVPN? (Choose two)
Option C and E since AnyConnect’s user focus beats DMVPN’s site-to-site model.
C and E, since AnyConnect focuses on user access and identity-based policies.
C/E? AnyConnect is really built around endpoint security and user identity, so customizing access policies (C) fits well. It also shines in giving individual users VPN access from their own devices (E), which DMVPN doesn’t focus on. Options like A and D are classic DMVPN features, and B feels off since AnyConnect isn’t designed to handle routing protocols over tunnels like DMVPN does. So the main perks of AnyConnect over DMVPN should be about user-centric access and control rather than site-to-site connectivity or routing flexibility.
B imo. AnyConnect is more about user-centric features, so it doesn’t really handle routing protocols over tunnels like DMVPN does. That skill belongs more to DMVPN (option B). Also, D is definitely a DMVPN thing since it’s designed for connecting multiple sites to a data center, which AnyConnect isn’t built for. So options A and D are out if we’re thinking about what AnyConnect offers over DMVPN. C and E fit better because they highlight user-level access and policy control, which are AnyConnect’s strengths.
Guessing C and E make the most sense since AnyConnect is more about user access and customized policies, unlike DMVPN which focuses on site-to-site. Options A and D are more DMVPN features anyway.
This one’s tricky, but I’m ruling out A and D because those are more about site-to-site setups, which DMVPN handles well. C and E feel right since AnyConnect is user-focused, giving custom access policies (C) and letting individual users connect securely (E). The key difference is that AnyConnect is client-based VPN for users, whereas DMVPN is more about connecting sites. So, I’d go with C and E here.
B. Container orchestration often involves managing Kubernetes clusters like EKS, so the ability to deploy Amazon EKS clusters with Cisco Container Platform fits well here.
Maybe C, sounds like air-gapped deployments fit container orchestration?