Free Cisco 350-701 Actual Exam Questions - Question 10 Discussion
capabilities to administrators to allow them to view endpoint application usage?
It’s definitely B. Thinking about it, AMP Enabler (C) is mainly about malware protection and not really focused on app usage monitoring or integrating with Splunk for that kind of visibility. Network Visibility is built to track traffic and endpoint behavior which aligns more with what Splunk needs to provide admins with detailed insights. Plus, Umbrella Roaming Security (A) is mostly DNS-based security, so that wouldn’t cover app usage stats either. D also doesn’t fit since ISE Posture is about compliance checks, not monitoring apps on endpoints.
I’m with B here. Umbrella Roaming Security (A) is more about DNS-layer protection, so it’s unlikely to provide detailed app usage data for Splunk monitoring. B it is.
D imo, ISE Posture checks endpoint health but doesn’t handle app usage monitoring.
B, since it’s the only option clearly about app usage data, not just security.
It’s B for me too. Network Visibility is specifically made to show detailed endpoint application usage, and that’s exactly what admins need when using Splunk for monitoring. AMP Enabler (C) mainly focuses on malware detection events, which is more about security alerts than general app usage stats. The other options don’t really fit the monitoring and Splunk integration angle as clearly as B does.
C imo, since AMP Enabler deals with advanced malware protection and often integrates with monitoring tools like Splunk.
Option B makes sense since Network Visibility focuses on monitoring and reporting, which fits the need to track endpoint app usage with Splunk integration.
D. community cloud sounds right here, since hybrid cloud (A) mixes public/private but doesn’t specifically mention multiple orgs managing it.