Free Cisco 350-501 SPCOR Actual Exam Questions - Question 3 Discussion
no packet loss issues when IGP and LDP protocols are not synchronized. Which configuring must the
engineer implement so that the IGP routing protocol will wait until LDP convergence is completed?
B/D? D suggests disabling synchronization, which seems the opposite of what's needed here. B fits best since it explicitly tells the IGP to wait for LDP convergence, avoiding packet loss.
I’m thinking about this a bit differently: option A talks about disabling CEF and enabling LDP, but wouldn’t disabling CEF cause forwarding issues or performance drops? That seems counterproductive. Option C handles LDP session protection, which is more about recovery rather than synchronization or waiting mechanisms. It’s really between B and D, but since D disables sync, it’s likely not what we want. So, if the goal is to have IGP wait for LDP, enabling synchronization as in B makes more sense. Still, anyone else see a use case for A here?
C imo is more about protecting LDP sessions from failure rather than making the IGP wait for LDP. The question asks specifically about ensuring no packet loss by having the IGP wait until LDP finishes converging. So, B still sounds like the right move because it explicitly makes sure the IGP holds off routing updates until LDP is stable. Disabling sync (D) seems counterproductive here, and A is unrelated to synchronization timing.
Maybe D because disabling synchronization would stop the IGP from waiting, which is the opposite of what we want. So to ensure waiting, syncing should be enabled, not disabled.
B tbh makes the most sense since it directly deals with syncing IGP and LDP to avoid packet loss during convergence. The other options don’t specifically address waiting for LDP to finish before routing changes.
Option B; it explicitly handles IGP-LDP synchronization.