Free Cisco 300-815 Actual Exam Questions | CLACCM Actual Exam Questions - Question 14 Discussion
routing the call through the PSTN? (Choose two.)
Maybe A and C. The AAR destination mask handles routing after denial, and the external phone number mask changes the number format for PSTN calls. The +E.164 mask feels more about dialing plans than rerouting.
A vs D? The AAR destination mask is for rerouting definitely, and the +E.164 alternate number mask sounds right for formatting the PSTN number after reroute. External phone number mask seems less about denial routing.
Option A and D – AAR destination mask for rerouting, plus +E.164 alternate for PSTN formatting.
Makes sense that A is one of them since AAR destination mask is about rerouting. I’d pick C too because external phone number mask modifies the number for PSTN, which fits here. So A and C.
A and C. The AAR destination mask definitely plays a role in rerouting calls after CAC denial, and the external phone number mask adjusts how the call appears once it goes out to the PSTN. The called party transform mask (B) mostly deals with digit manipulation for outbound calls but isn't directly tied to rerouting after L-CAC denies the call. The +E.164 alternate number mask is more about formatting numbers for alternate routes, but it’s not commonly paired with AAR in this context.
A/C? The AAR destination mask directs rerouting, and the external phone number mask changes the number format for calls exiting the network. B feels more about digit manipulation before the call leaves, so less relevant here.
Maybe A and D since AAR destination mask shapes rerouting and +E.164 mask fits PSTN formatting.
Not totally sure about the difference between the called party transform mask and the external phone number mask here. Anyone know which two really apply with AAR after L-CAC denies the call?