Free Cisco 300-810 Actual Exam Questions - Question 7 Discussion
version 10.x. The engineer has confirnæd that the server recovery manager service is configured
using system defaults. The engineer notices that user sessions have not fallen back to the homed
nodes. What is the cause this Issue?
D. The system typically requires the failed service or server to be stable for a certain period before sessions can fail back. If the recovery hasn’t reached that 30-minute threshold, the fallback won’t trigger automatically. This prevents flapping or unstable failover situations. So even if everything looks good, you might just need to wait a bit longer before seeing sessions move back.
Makes sense that fallback needs manual trigger, so A.
D sounds plausible since the system might wait for a stable recovery period before allowing fallback. If the failed service or server hasn't been active long enough, it could block session failback automatically.
B imo, moving user accounts can prevent fallback even if services recover.
B tbh, if user accounts were moved to the redundant server, it might block sessions from falling back automatically since the active home node changed. This can cause the system to stick with the current node rather than reverting. Also, A feels less likely because the question says sessions haven’t fallen back—not that fallback was never triggered. So, the account location on the redundant server seems like a solid cause here.
Maybe A, fallback often needs manual confirmation to trigger.
Option D makes sense too because if the failed service hasn’t been active for 30 minutes, the system might delay fallback to avoid flapping. This timing requirement could explain why sessions didn’t move back yet.
C