Free Cisco SWSA 300-725 Actual Exam Questions - Question 11 Discussion

I agree that B seems unlikely because indexing data typically requires a license in Cisco products. Also, C doesn’t sound right since removing log files after indexing could risk losing important audit trails or data needed for troubleshooting. AWSR likely keeps logs intact for compliance and analysis. So, I’d back D too, as CLI installs on Windows and Red Hat make sense given Cisco’s usual deployment methods for this tool. The focus on CLI installation aligns with enterprise security software norms.

A seems off since IPs aren’t reliable for differentiating WSA deployments.

Not sure about the install specifics, but B sounds off since indexing usually needs a license.

Maybe C, since automatic log removal after indexing seems risky and uncommon. AWSR probably keeps logs for auditing, so manual cleanup feels more likely than built-in deletion.

This one caught my eye because of the licensing part. I don’t think B is right since usually, indexing data in Cisco tools requires a license due to resource usage and features. Also, C seems off because deleting log files automatically after indexing sounds risky and not standard practice. So I’m with A here—using IPs to differentiate WSA deployments makes sense for accurate data handling without mixing logs between units.

A imo, IP addresses are key to handling multiple WSA units properly.

Maybe B since indexing data usually needs a license for advanced features.

It’s A. AWSR relies on IP addresses to distinguish between different Cisco WSA devices, which helps with accurate data reporting. That makes more sense than D since installation isn’t just CLI-based.

Isn't it option D since AWSR setup is typically CLI-focused on those OS?

Probably C. AWSR removing log files after indexing makes sense for storage management.