Free Cisco SWSA 300-725 Actual Exam Questions - Question 10 Discussion

It’s A, because allowing or blocking right away would be risky without traffic analysis.

Option A makes the most sense since blocking right away could disrupt legitimate traffic. Monitoring first lets you see what’s being flagged before taking tougher actions.

A. Monitor avoids immediate disruptions and lets you analyze traffic first.

A imo, safer to monitor first before deciding to block or allow.

A. Starting with monitor makes sense because it lets you see what traffic hits that category before making any blocking or allowing decisions. Safer than jumping straight to allow or block.

It’s A because new categories usually start in monitor to avoid unintentional blocks.

D imo, decrypt doesn’t really fit as a default action since that’s more about inspecting traffic rather than handling it outright. So I’d rule out D right away. Between monitor, allow, and block, monitor feels like the safest default to avoid disrupting traffic unexpectedly, which matches what most security tools do initially. So I’m sticking with A on this one.

I’m with the monitor default since it’s safer to watch first and avoid accidental blocks. So, A sounds right here.

Makes sense to start safe by blocking unknowns but usually, custom categories begin in monitor mode to gather traffic info first. So I’d go with A.

A. I think the default being 'monitor' fits better as it lets admins observe traffic before deciding to allow or block. Starting with allow or block feels too risky without data.

C imo, usually new categories default to blocking until explicitly allowed.

Probably B, but does it depend on the system version?