Free Cisco 300-715 SISE Actual Exam Questions - Question 6 Discussion
configured with the Administration. Policy Service, and Monitoring personas to protect from a
complete node failure?
Option B seems right because dispersed mode is designed so every node handles all personas, ensuring full redundancy if one fails. Distributed splits roles, so it won’t give that kind of protection.
B/D? Distributed definitely doesn’t fit since it separates roles, so no full redundancy on each node. Two-node feels limited in scale and might not have the full persona set on both nodes. Hybrid mixes personas, so it’s not every node with all roles either. That leaves dispersed, which is designed exactly for full persona redundancy on every node to avoid single points of failure. Makes sense to pick B here for true full redundancy across nodes.
It’s D for me. Hybrid mixes persona assignments, so not all nodes have every persona, which doesn’t fully guard against total node failure like the dispersed model does. This sets it apart from the others.
A/C? Distributed usually splits personas across nodes, so it’s not fully redundant like dispersed. Two-node is a smaller setup and might not cover full redundancy either. The question stresses every node running all personas, which isn’t typical for distributed or two-node, making those less likely than dispersed. But hybrid mixes deployment types, so might not guarantee all nodes have all personas either. Still, distributed and two-node feel less aligned with the “every node” part mentioned here.
It’s definitely B here. The key part is that every node runs all three personas, so if one node fails, the system keeps going without losing any functions. The other options don’t offer that full redundancy since they separate roles across different nodes or only have limited duplication. Dispersed is designed exactly for this kind of fault tolerance by spreading everything everywhere.
Guessing B, since only dispersed has all personas on each node for full redundancy.
It’s B because in the dispersed model, each node handles all personas, so if one fails, the others keep running everything seamlessly. That matches the full redundancy described here.
Maybe B on this one - dispersed sounds like the model where every node handles all personas to avoid single points of failure. Just my guess though.