Free Cisco 300-715 SISE Actual Exam Questions - Question 11 Discussion
does not support native supplicant provisioning provided by Cisco ISE. Which portal must the
employee use to provision to the device?
A. This is about a mobile device without native supplicant support, so BYOD portal fits since it’s designed for manual provisioning on personal devices lacking native support.
D, client provisioning handles devices without native supplicant support directly.
A/D? I’d say A because BYOD portals are designed to support devices lacking native supplicant support through manual steps, while D is more for pushing clients to devices that can accept them.
A/D? The key here is the device can’t do native supplicant provisioning. BYOD portals usually handle personal devices with manual setup steps, while Client Provisioning is more about pushing software when devices can’t do native config. Since it’s just “new mobile device” and no mention if it’s personal or corporate, Client Provisioning might be safer if the device needs software installed to get on the network. But if the device is personal and can do manual setup, BYOD could work too. Without more detail on ownership, both seem plausible.
This feels like D to me because the Client Provisioning portal is meant exactly for devices that can’t do native supplicant setup and need something pushed or manually installed. Ryan K.
It’s A because BYOD portals are meant for personal devices without native supplicant support, letting users manually set up their device for network access. Client Provisioning usually pushes software, but BYOD handles manual steps too.
Probably D here since Client Provisioning portal is designed for devices that can’t do native supplicant setup, letting employees manually install the necessary software.
I’m thinking the Personal Device portal (B) might be the right fit since it’s often used when native supplicant provisioning isn’t available and users need to set up manually. Does that make sense here?
A. I think BYOD makes more sense here because it’s designed for devices that don’t have native supplicant support, so users can manually download and install the supplicant through that portal. Client Provisioning usually requires some native support, so probably not the best fit.
A/D? The question mentions no native supplicant provisioning, so I’m wondering if Client Provisioning (D) is the right choice since it usually handles that. But BYOD portals (A) are often for onboarding personal devices. Anyone know if Cisco ISE treats those differently for devices without native support? Also, which Cisco ISE version is this related to? That might affect what portals are available or recommended.