Free Cisco 300-715 SISE Actual Exam Questions - Question 1 Discussion

C/D? C definitely stands out because TACACS+ is designed to provide command accounting, letting you track user actions in detail, which RADIUS doesn't do as well. D seems less likely since TACACS+ doesn't rely on SSL certificates specifically; it uses TCP with its own encryption method. Also, option A's latency point feels less relevant to report reviewing in Cisco ISE. So, I’d pick C for the added insight in reports through command accounting, even if it might need some setup to see all details.

C/D? While C highlights command accounting as a TACACS+ advantage, D’s mention of SSL certificates feels off since TACACS+ typically uses TCP with encryption but not specifically SSL certs. So C seems more accurate here.

I’m thinking about option A since TACACS+ separates authentication and authorization, which might reduce latency during report generation compared to RADIUS handling them together. Could this impact how quickly reports are compiled?

C. TACACS+ definitely stands out for command accounting, which is useful for detailed audit trails. RADIUS mainly focuses on authentication and authorization, so you don’t get that granular command-level info in reports. Even if Cisco ISE needs some extra setup to fully capture command logs, TACACS+ inherently supports that data better, making it a clear advantage for review purposes.

I think C fits because TACACS+ can log detailed commands executed, which helps in thorough reporting, unlike RADIUS that bundles auth and authorization but doesn’t track commands as well. So, C.

Option C makes sense since TACACS+ lets you track command accounting separately, which isn’t something RADIUS handles as well. Seen similar stuff with Cisco gear before.