Free Cisco 300-425 ENWLSD Actual Exam Questions - Question 14 Discussion
Guests at headquarters need wireless access for presentations, demonstrations, and sharing of
information. The engineer must provide external users with secure guest access by
connecting to anchor controllers on the DMZ. Auto-Anchor Mobility has been selected in the
mobility group to accomplish it. Both anchors are configured as part of the mobility group for HQ.
Which design approach ensures that clients connect to the primary controller first and are
pushed to the secondary if the primary fails?
Actually, option B might cause the secondary to be preferred first, which is not what we want.
Option A sounds right since in most networking setups, a lower priority number means higher preference. So setting the primary controller's anchor priority to 1 should make clients try it first, and only failover to the secondary if needed. Option B would just flip that logic, which doesn’t make sense if you want the primary preferred initially. The ECMP options (C and D) feel more complex and less likely to control strict failover order like priority settings do.
Maybe B could work too, since setting the secondary to priority 1 might force clients to prefer the other anchor first if its priority is higher, ensuring failover.
Maybe A makes sense since a lower priority value usually means higher preference, so setting the primary controller's anchor priority to 1 should make clients connect there first.
A