Free Cisco 300-410 ENARSI Actual Exam Questions - Question 13 Discussion

Question No. 13Drag & Drop

DRAG DROP An engineer must establish a connection between two CE routers for two customers with overlapping IP addresses Customer_a is connected to interfaces Gig0/0, and Customer_b is connected to interfaces Gig0/1. Routers CE1 and CE2 are configured as follows: 300-410 practice exam questions Drag and drop the code snippets from the right onto the boxes in the configuration to establish the needed connection. Snippets may be used more than once. 300-410 real exam questions

Options
Acustomer_a
Bcustomer_b
C192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
D192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0
Drag an item to a target. Click × to remove.
Answer Area
interface Gig0/0 ip vrf forwarding
Drop item here
ip address
Drop item here
interface Gig0/1 ip vrf forwarding
Drop item here
ip address
Drop item here
interface Gig0/0 ip vrf forwarding
Drop item here
ip address
Drop item here
interface Gig0/1 ip vrf forwarding
Drop item here
ip address
Drop item here
US
BO
Bilal O.
2026-02-17

C fits better for route-target import/export since it’s symmetric on both sides.

0
SA
Shah A.
2026-01-30

I see why B and D are picked for the VRF setup and interface assignments. For the remaining two, I’d go with C in one slot because it has the route-target commands needed to import/export routes between VRFs, which is critical to get the customers talking despite overlapping IPs. Snippet A seems more basic without the route-targets, so C fits better for route leaking. So overall, B and D for VRFs/interfaces and C for route-targets/import-export makes sense here.

0
SA
Shah A.
2026-01-25

I agree B and D are essential for creating VRFs and binding interfaces. For the other two slots, I’d pick A over C because snippet A includes the route-target import/export commands needed to allow route leaking between VRFs on both routers. Without that, the two sides wouldn’t know about each other’s routes even if VRFs are set up. Snippet C is more about generic interface config without VRF specifics, so it seems less relevant here.

0
IX
Irfan X.
2026-01-22

I think snippet B for creating VRFs fits since you need separate routing tables for overlapping IPs. Also, snippet D makes sense because it assigns interfaces to the right VRFs, isolating customer traffic. This way, each customer’s traffic won’t mix despite overlapping addresses. Snippets that don’t mention VRFs or route-maps probably won’t handle the overlap correctly, so I’d avoid those.

0
IX
Irfan X.
2026-01-18

Looks like route-maps and VRFs are key here, probably snippets B and D.

0