Free ACAMS CAMS Actual Exam Questions s - Question 2 Discussion

Question No. 2
On discovering employees had unintentionally provided assistance to customers who were
structuring transactions, an anti-money laundering specialist should recommend
Select one option, then reveal solution.
US
RG
Rayan G.
2026-02-19

B imo, monitoring employees helps spot if issues continue or escalate before retraining.

0
RK
Ryan K.
2026-02-18

C imo, retraining directly addresses the accidental issue without overreacting.

0
MA
Mohammad A.
2026-02-11

It’s C. Since the employees didn’t help on purpose, retraining is a practical fix. Termination or transferring doesn’t solve the root problem; they just treat symptoms.

0
MA
Mohammad A.
2026-01-27

Option C makes sense; training prevents future mistakes better than punishment.

0
MA
Mohammad A.
2026-01-26

It’s C, because firing seems harsh for an honest mistake; better to educate.

0
AT
Adeel T.
2026-01-23

D imo, transferring employees (D) doesn’t really solve the root problem and might just shuffle the risk elsewhere. Since the help was unintentional, you’d want to focus on fixing the knowledge gap rather than punishing or moving them. So C still feels like the most practical approach here because it addresses prevention directly without overreacting.

0
MB
Marco B.
2026-01-19

Maybe C is best here since the employees helped without meaning to. Training should fix the issue instead of jumping to serious steps like firing or legal action.

0
MB
Marco B.
2026-01-18

Option C makes sense since the employees didn’t do it on purpose, so firing them right away (A) seems harsh. Also, contacting law enforcement (B) is probably too extreme if they weren’t knowingly involved. Moving them to another branch (D) doesn’t really solve the problem with the lack of awareness. Training to fix the gap in knowledge and prevent future mistakes seems like the best move here.

0
CG
Carlos G.
2026-01-15

This question feels unclear. Anyone thinking C or something else?

0