Free VMware 2V0-13.25 Actual Exam Questions - Question 4 Discussion
The customer technical team is presenting an overview of the current state of the infrastructure as
well as describing what the expectations are for the private cloud.
Based on the notes captured by the architect, which statement should be documented as a
constraint?
Good point on B being a financial lock-in; that’s a classic constraint since it limits choices.
I’d say B is definitely a constraint here since no funding for new storage means the team has to stick with what they have, which really limits options right off the bat. It’s not just a preference; it forces the design to work within that budget restriction, making it a clear constraint.
I think option C stands out because security zone requirements directly limit how the environment must be segmented, which is a strict design constraint to meet compliance and operational policies. C
Maybe D fits best as a constraint because it sets a non-negotiable design requirement—centralized management across both data centers. That’s a clear architectural limitation that shapes the solution. Options A and B are more about current state or budget issues, which might influence choices but aren’t strict design constraints by themselves. C is more of a design consideration than a constraint since security zones can usually be designed around. So the centralized management need feels like the most fixed boundary here.
Option A also makes sense as a constraint because out-of-maintenance hardware limits what can be reliably used or supported, restricting design choices beyond just budget concerns.
B. The lack of funding for new storage directly restricts what can be deployed, which is a clear constraint on the project. While A talks about maintenance status, without funding restrictions in B, you could theoretically replace or upgrade hardware. So B sets a firm boundary that influences design choices more strongly than just hardware status.
Maybe A, since out-of-maintenance hardware limits support options regardless of funding.
It’s B, budget limits usually define real constraints over technical conditions.
It’s A because having storage out of vendor maintenance limits support and upgrades, which is a hard constraint on the infrastructure’s reliability and future-proofing, not just a preference or risk.
B, since zero funding for new storage clearly restricts design options.
This one feels like B again, since no new storage funding really boxes in the design choices. Option A is more a risk or issue than a hard constraint. C and D seem like must-haves or requirements but not something that limits options directly. So B fits best as the constraint here.
B imo, since no new storage funding directly limits design options.
Are we sure the question wants a constraint or a requirement? For example, option B seems like a clear constraint due to funding, but C and D also define design boundaries. Is the focus on budget limits only?