Free ServiceNow CTA Actual Exam Questions - Question 10 Discussion

Option A makes sense too because scoped-app and global config splits handle environment-specific settings, keeping development isolated but consistent across the stack. It’s a practical way to separate concerns.

A/C? Scoped-app and global config splits make sense when you want clear boundaries between shared settings and app-specific changes, which is practical in multi-dev setups. But geographic and functional splits also feel relevant since teams often split by location or role to streamline work. Both have valid points depending on how the environment handles collaboration and configuration management. D seems more about project management than the actual split types in a development stack.

It’s D because timeline and project-based splits help manage parallel work streams and deadlines, which is common in multi-development setups. This way, progress stays organized across different phases.

C imo, geographic and functional splits often come up when teams are spread out or handle different tasks, which fits well in multi-dev environments beyond just product or timeline views.

Thinking about typical multi-dev setups, B makes sense for tracking features and versions. B

A imo, scoped-app and global configs are common split types in dev stacks.

Option D makes sense too since timeline and project splits help manage development phases and tasks separately, which is common in multi-dev setups. It’s a practical way to keep things organized.

C imo, geographic and functional splits cover different team focuses well.

A, because scoped-app and global configurations clearly separate dev environments.

B (product and release make the most sense here)