Free Scrum PSM I Actual Exam Questions - Question 9 Discussion
resolve only a small portion of the impediments. Which three techniques would be most helpful in
this situation? (Choose three.)
Option A, B, and D seem to be the practical trio here. Consulting with the team (A) helps surface new info and ideas on tackling issues. Prioritizing (B) prevents spreading efforts too thin over minor blockers. Alerting management (D) is key because some impediments are beyond the Scrum Master's direct influence and need higher-level support. Option C feels like adding unnecessary complexity without clear evidence that project managers are the right group to involve. This approach keeps things focused and action-driven.
B, D, and A make sense since prioritizing and alerting management helps clear blockers.
Maybe B, D, and C here. Prioritizing (B) is a no-brainer, and if the list’s huge, getting project managers together (C) could fast-track decisions. Alerting management (D) ensures support to clear big roadblocks.
Makes sense that prioritizing (B) is crucial to focus effort, and alerting management (D) gets higher-ups involved. Adding consulting with the dev team (A) helps spot blockers sooner, so I’d pick A, B, and D.
B imo for sure, gotta prioritize so you don’t drown in issues. D makes sense too, management needs to know what’s blocking stuff. Not sure about the third one, A could help if the dev team has ideas, but C feels like adding more layers and slowing things down. What did you pick?