Free Scrum PSM I Actual Exam Questions - Question 6 Discussion

Option A is key because retrospectives focus on process improvements for the next Sprint. Option D feels off since acceptance criteria usually get sorted during backlog refinement or planning, not retrospectives.

B imo because the Product Backlog order is usually handled during refinement or Sprint Planning, not retrospectives. The retro is more about how the team works together and what can be improved next sprint, so C fits better there. Also, D feels more like a Planning topic since it’s about defining work upfront, not reflecting on past sprints. So A and C seem like the most independent and clear choices for retrospective discussions.

C A retrospective is all about team dynamics and improvements, so C makes sense.

A/D? I know A fits because retrospectives talk about improvements, but D might also work since acceptance criteria can impact how smoothly the next sprint runs. C is about collaboration, which is important, but sometimes that’s covered more in daily standups or team discussions outside the retro. B definitely seems out since backlog order is product owner’s job. So A and D could be a solid choice if you think about preparing for the next sprint in terms of clarity and improvements.

Maybe D is less likely because acceptance criteria are usually defined during backlog refinement or planning, not the retro. Between A and C, both seem right since retrospectives are about improving how the team works and their processes. B feels off because the backlog order is typically sorted during refinement sessions, not retrospectives. So A and C still make the most sense to me for what’s discussed in a Sprint Retrospective.

D imo, B is about backlog prioritization, which is typically done in Backlog Refinement, not the Retrospective. So A and C still make the most sense as they focus on process and teamwork improvements.

Pretty straightforward, A and C seem right.