Free Salesforce Rev-Con-201 Actual Exam Questions - Question 13 Discussion
last contract term. The customer is ready to renew, and the sales user wants to maintain the same
prices for their renewal.
What should the sales user do in Asset Management to keep the prices the same?
B imo, it directly locks in last negotiated prices without extra setup.
B/C? If the main goal is just to keep prices steady, B sounds straightforward. But if quantities vary a lot and need precise handling, C might be safer to avoid messing up renewals.
Maybe B makes sense since it locks in the last negotiated prices regardless of quantity changes. That seems simpler than customizing flows or relying on lot-based renewals, which might be overkill here.
Guessing B could also work here since setting the Pricing Source on Asset to Last Negotiated Price should force the renewal to stick with the latest agreed prices, even if quantities varied. That way, you’re not messing with complex renewal flows and just locking in what was last negotiated. It’s simpler and might avoid unintended resets. Still, C feels more robust for upsells, but B seems like a valid approach if the goal is strictly to maintain pricing without changing process flows.
Probably C. Since the quantities and prices changed during the contract, lot-based or as-is renewals seem designed to keep those variations intact for the renewal. Makes more sense than just last negotiated price.
Maybe C since lot-based renewals better handle upsell variations over time.
B tbh. Setting Pricing Source to Last Negotiated Price keeps the same renewal prices. Simple and direct.