Free Salesforce Rev-Con-201 Actual Exam Questions - Question 1 Discussion

It’s A. Without Product Configuration Rules User, the rep can add the bundle but can’t modify or configure the options inside it. That permission controls access to the actual configuration rules needed.

C, because they can add the bundle but can't open any configurator interface.

If the rep can add the bundle but not configure it anywhere, maybe they’re missing permission to actually open the configurator UI, which sounds more like C than A or B. Could the problem be about access to the configurator interface itself?

Makes sense that the rep can add the bundle but not configure it, so lacking the basic Product Configurator (C) permission fits best here. Without it, configuring wouldn't be possible after adding. C

C seems right since the rep can add the bundle but can’t configure it, so they likely lack the core Product Configurator permission needed to make changes to the bundle options.

A imo, if the rep can add but not configure, it sounds like they’re missing the permission tied to applying or using configuration rules, which fits Product Configuration Rules User better than just Product Configurator.

B/C? Maybe they need the designer role to tweak config settings before configuring.

This one’s tricky, but I’d go with C. Product Configurator sounds like the core permission needed to actually configure bundles after adding them. A makes sense for accessing configuration rules, but if the rep can’t even open the configurator to adjust options, they probably lack C. The ability to add the bundle shows they have basic access, so missing the full configurator permission fits better here.

A, since adding is allowed but configuring needs the config rules user permission.

A. The rep can add the bundle, so it’s not about creating or designing config rules (B). They just can’t configure it, which points to missing the Product Configuration Rules User permission.

Maybe A makes more sense here. If the rep can add the bundle but can’t configure it, it could be because they’re missing the Product Configuration Rules User permission, which controls access to configuring bundles with rules. Option C might allow general configurator access, but without A, the rules-based config for bundles wouldn’t work. So, I’d say it’s probably A rather than C.

Option A makes sense here because the Product Configuration Rules User permission is specifically tied to enabling users to configure products with rules applied, like bundles. Without it, the rep might see the bundle but can’t dive into its configuration. Option C is close, but that’s more about general configurator access rather than rule-based bundle setups. So missing A could explain why they can’t configure the bundle despite adding it to the quote.

C (bundle config needs Product Configurator permission)