Free Salesforce Plat-101 Actual Exam Questions - Question 6 Discussion

B tbh doesn’t fit with multi-tenant because that’s more about isolated environments, which is single-tenant’s thing. Multi-tenant is all about efficiency by letting tenants share the same system resources rather than each having a chunk set aside just for them. That sharing aspect is what makes C the better pick here.

C imo. Multi-tenant means several tenants access the same system and share its resources, instead of each having their own dedicated setup. B’s off because reserving resources per tenant sounds more like single-tenant or isolated environments. A is also incorrect since multi-tenant usually aims to reduce costs, not increase them.

It’s C because the whole point of multi-tenant architecture is that multiple tenants use the same resources to save costs and improve efficiency. A’s wrong since multi-tenant usually cuts costs compared to single-tenant. B doesn’t fit since reserving resources per tenant would be more like single-tenant setups, not multi. Sharing resources is definitely the main characteristic here.

It’s definitely C. Multi-tenant setups mean multiple tenants use the same pool of resources, so sharing is a core part of it. A and B just don’t match that concept.

Yeah, I’d go with C too. Multi-tenant means multiple users or tenants use the same resources, so sharing is key. A and B don’t really fit since A is usually cheaper, not more expensive, and B is about dedicated resources, which goes against the whole multi-tenant setup. So C makes the most sense here.

Actually, B seems less likely because reserving resources per tenant means dedicated allocation, which goes against the multi-tenant principle of resource sharing. C nails that shared resource angle perfectly.

C/B? C definitely fits, but B could confuse some since reserving resources per tenant sounds like isolation, which is more single-tenant. Sharing (C) really captures the multi-tenant idea better.

Maybe C, because multi-tenant setups typically pool resources to serve multiple users, unlike single-tenant which isolates them. That sharing is the core idea here.

A/B? It can’t be A because multi-tenant usually cuts costs by sharing. B sounds off since it’s more about sharing than reserving resources separately. C still feels like the best fit.

C looks right since multi-tenant means sharing resources among tenants, right?