Free Salesforce Administrator ADM-201 Actual Exam Questions - Question 14 Discussion
that filled out an interest from online. The team currently does not access to the lead object.
How should an administrator provide proper access?
Maybe B, since permission sets can easily add lead access without messing with roles or sharing.
It’s D because manual sharing lets you give specific users access without changing profiles or roles, perfect if it’s just a few users who need lead access temporarily.
B imo, permission sets are the cleanest way to grant extra object access without overhauling profiles. Creating new profiles (A) seems heavy if it’s just for lead access.
D Manual sharing is more for individual records, not entire object access. Since they currently lack any access to the lead object, this won’t fix the core issue. Better to change permissions at profile or permission set level.
If the support users don’t currently have access to the lead object, just assigning a role won’t help since roles mainly control record visibility, not object permissions themselves. Creating a new profile (A) feels heavy-handed and could mess up other permissions. Manual sharing (D) is good for one-off access but not efficient for a whole team needing ongoing access. So it makes sense to use permission sets (B) to grant lead access without changing their existing profile or role structure. Does anyone know if these support users share the same job function or if they’d need different levels o
Not sure if they need permanent access or just occasional. If it’s temporary, manual sharing (D) might work, but for ongoing access, permission sets (B) sound cleaner than creating new profiles or roles. What’s the exact scope of their access need here?