Free PMI PMI-RMP Actual Exam Questions - Question 11 Discussion
different locations involving multiple stakeholders. What should the risk manager do to organize the
prevailing risks?
B imo, group risk assessments help unify perspectives across locations without missing out on key risks.
It’s C here. Since there are 12 deliverables spread over different locations, getting individual assessments lets each area highlight its specific risks without bias from others. Group sessions might drown out some local issues. After collecting individual inputs, those can be consolidated into a comprehensive risk register. This method ensures detailed coverage and avoids missing niche risks that come with diverse sites and stakeholders.
C seems worth considering since individual assessments can dig into specific deliverables more thoroughly before grouping risks later. Multiple locations mean unique local risks that might not come up in group talks.
It’s A because mixing both methods ensures no risk perspective is overlooked across locations.
I’m thinking B could work too, since focus groups allow stakeholders from all locations to discuss and uncover shared risks directly. But does that capture all individual concerns as well as A might?
Option B might work better since focus groups can help surface risks through discussion, especially with multiple stakeholders involved in different locations. Individual assessments alone could miss group dynamics and interdependencies.
A/C? Not sure if just individual assessments cover all risks across locations and stakeholders, and focus groups alone might miss some details. Combining both seems more thorough but the explanation is kinda vague here.