Free Palo Alto Networks SSE-Engineer Actual Exam Questions - Question 2 Discussion
Access?
C/D? I think the upgrade shouldn’t touch data flows, but HA might add extra protection.
It’s C for sure. The plugin update mainly touches control components and shouldn’t mess with the actual traffic flows. If it caused latency or terminated sessions, there’d be a lot more complaints. Also, D doesn’t hold because high availability setups wouldn’t change how the plugin update impacts existing flows; it’s designed to be seamless regardless. So the best choice here is that users won’t notice any difference during the update.
It’s C. The plugin update mainly handles backend controls and doesn’t disrupt the actual data flows. If it did cause latency or drop sessions, that’d be a huge deal, and I haven’t seen Prisma Access updates flagged for that. Also, option D mentioning HA mode feels off since Prisma Access is built to handle updates smoothly no matter the Panorama setup. So, the safest bet is that users won’t notice any change during the plugin upgrade.
I’m not sure about HA mode being required here—usually updates like this aim for zero downtime without extra setup. Could the upgrade cause any background latency instead of full flow termination or disruption?
Option C seems solid because the plugin update is designed to be seamless, so existing traffic flows shouldn’t drop or get interrupted. From what I know, this process is mostly transparent to users regardless of the Prisma Access version or HA setup. Option D tries to bring HA into the picture, but I haven’t seen anything that says flows depend on HA mode for this particular update. So, the safest bet is that flows stay unaffected during the plugin upgrade without needing HA involved.
It’s C, the plugin update is designed to be seamless without disrupting flows.
It’s definitely not B or A since terminating flows or causing latency would be a major problem for a cloud service like Prisma Access. Between C and D, D mentions HA mode, but I don’t think the plugin update depends on Panorama deployment to keep flows intact. The update should be designed to not affect traffic regardless of HA. So, C makes more sense because the plugin upgrade is supposed to be seamless and transparent for users.
Pretty sure it’s C. The upgrade doesn’t mess with existing traffic flows, so users won’t notice anything.