Free Palo Alto Networks NGFW-Engineer Actual Exam Questions - Question 2 Discussion

D, cause PA-7050 and CN-Series are known for advanced routing alongside VM-Series.

I agree with ruling out C because PA-850 and PA-460 are definitely not high-end enough for ARE. A seems best since PA-5280 and PA-7080 are known for advanced routing—so I’d pick A.

I’m thinking option C might not fit because PA-850 and PA-460 are more mid-range models, which probably don’t support ARE. Would the presence of PA-3260 or PA-5410 be enough to include ARE support there?

A makes sense because PA-3250 and PA-7080 are clearly built for advanced routing tasks, unlike the lower-end models in other options that likely lack proper ARE support.

I’m with the idea that D is off because CN-Series and VM-Series don’t really fit the typical ARE hardware lineup. Between A and C, I’d go with A since PA-7080 and PA-5280 are designed for ultra-high performance and definitely support ARE. C has some mid-range options like PA-850 and PA-460, which usually aren’t geared for ARE. So A makes more sense from a model capability standpoint.

Guessing C since PA-3260 and PA-5410 are definitely in the high-end range that supports ARE.

B tbh, most ARE features show up on higher-end hardware, and options like PA-455 and PA-1410 don’t typically support advanced routing engines. So that one feels off compared to the others.

A/C? I’m thinking A because the PA-7080 and PA-5280 are known for high-end routing capabilities, which fits the ARE use case. C has some solid models, but PA-850 and PA-460 don’t really match the ARE feature set as well. Plus, A includes VM-Series, which can support ARE in some deployments, so it seems more comprehensive. D throws in CN-Series, which I’m unsure about for ARE, and B has lower-tier models that probably don’t support advanced routing engines.

Does the question specify if ARE support includes virtual models or just hardware? D