Free NVIDIA NCP-AIN Actual Exam Questions - Question 10 Discussion
What does NetQ leverage (in addition to NVIDIA "What Just Happened" switch telemetry data and
NVIDIA DOCA telemetry) to help network operators proactively identify server and application root
cause issues?
A/C? Flow telemetry (A) helps track traffic paths directly, while application telemetry (C) ties issues to the app layer, both useful for root cause. Behavioral (B) feels less direct for pinpointing specific server/app problems.
I’m going with A here. Flow telemetry makes sense since it provides real-time insights about traffic between devices, which can help pinpoint where issues originate. It’s more immediate than behavioral patterns and complements the switch and DOCA data well. Also, since they mention proactive identification, flow data would give clear signals on server or app-level bottlenecks early on. So, A feels like the best fit from a network ops standpoint.
B imo. Behavioral telemetry fits best here since it adds context on network patterns and anomalies, complementing raw flow or application data. It’s more about spotting unusual activities proactively rather than just collecting straightforward traffic stats like flow telemetry. Also, application telemetry (C) seems a bit narrow since the question includes both server and app root causes, which behavioral metrics can cover more broadly. D and A don’t seem quite right for proactive identification compared to behavioral insights.
Makes sense to rule out D since packet capture is usually more detailed and reactive, not proactive. B feels right because behavioral telemetry focuses on patterns that help spot issues before they get worse. B
Gotcha, I think it's A because real-time flow data directly shows traffic issues. A
A imo. Flow telemetry is all about tracking real-time traffic flows, which sounds critical for pinpointing server and app issues quickly. Behavioral telemetry feels more about patterns over time, so it’s less immediate. Since the question mentions helping network ops proactively, having detailed flow data alongside switch and DOCA telemetry seems like the best fit here. D and C don’t really match the proactive troubleshooting angle as well as A.
A/B? Flow telemetry gives real-time traffic data, which seems useful for spotting root causes early, but behavioral telemetry fits the proactive angle too. Could be either depending on the focus.
B imo