Free Microsoft SC-200 Security Operations Analyst Actual Exam Questions - Question 6 Discussion
HOTSPOT You have a Microsoft Sentinel workspace You develop a custom Advanced Security information Model (ASIM) parser named Parser1 that produces a schema named Schema1. You need to validate Schema1. How should you complete the command? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
Make sure the command includes both Parser1 and Schema1 parameters explicitly.
I think the key is to specify both the parser and schema in the command so it knows exactly what to validate, which rules out any generic validation commands. So, options mentioning both Parser1 and Schema1 make the most sense here.
I’d pick the option that calls ValidateParser with Schema1 explicitly named.
Option with explicit schema validation looks like the best fit here.
Option that explicitly mentions validating Schema1 by name seems right.
I actually think the command needs to explicitly mention the parser and schema names in the validation parameters, so it’s not just about picking a cmdlet with “validate” in it. You want something that targets Schema1 directly, confirming the parser output aligns with the expected schema. That way it’s a specific check, not a general parser validation or deployment step. Options that just say “validate” but don’t specify the schema or parser seem too generic for this scenario.
I'd go with the option that uses a specific validation cmdlet rather than just parsing or deploying. That usually means it's built for schema checking, which fits the question.
B, because it mentions schema validation explicitly, unlike the others.
Check for a Validate or Test command specifically for schemas, not deployment.
I'd look for the option that includes something like "Test-ASIMParser" or "Validate-ASIMSchema" since those would specifically check the parser or schema. Anything mentioning "Deploy" or "Publish" probably isn't for validation but for rolling out changes. Since the question is about validating Schema1 from Parser1, the command should directly reference both to ensure it’s testing the right components. If the choices include parameters for parser name and schema, picking those would help narrow it down correctly.
I’d focus on parts that mention validation in the command options. Usually, you’d pick something related to “validate” or “test” paired with the parser and schema names. Other options likely don’t fit the validation step.
Are we given the command framework or just need to guess the options?