Free Microsoft GH-900 Actual Exam Questions - Question 6 Discussion

D for sure, and B makes sense since commenters are often collaborators.

Probably D for sure since assigning usually requires write access. For the other one, I’d say C because having a personal GitHub account is a basic requirement to be assigned, even if they don’t have write permissions yet. A and B seem less solid since just commenting or having an enterprise account doesn’t guarantee assignment rights.

D imo since write permissions are a must. I’d also go with B because anyone who’s engaged by commenting is likely part of the project and can be assigned.

D feels like a no-brainer since you usually can’t assign someone who doesn’t have at least write access. For the second option, I’m thinking B might be right because commenting shows some level of involvement, and GitHub sometimes lets you assign participants who’ve commented. A and C don’t seem right since just having an account doesn’t guarantee any link to the repo. Does assigning really extend beyond people with repo permissions?

Maybe D is a solid pick since write access looks essential. For the second, I’d say C because having a personal account doesn’t guarantee permissions, so it’s less likely than B or A.

Makes sense that D is needed because you need access rights. I’d pick A as the second since enterprise accounts usually have broader permissions than just personal ones. So D and A.

Probably D for sure since write permissions are needed to assign someone. For the second choice, I’m thinking B might be right too because sometimes people assign anyone involved in the conversation, and commenting shows involvement. A personal GitHub account alone (C) doesn’t mean they have access, and enterprise accounts (A) don’t guarantee rights either. So D and B seem like the best fit here.

Anyone with write access definitely fits, but can’t just anyone who’s commented be assigned? Seems risky without explicit permissions. Could B really hold up, or is it more about repo roles than interaction history?

Maybe B and D, since commenting shows involvement but assigning needs write access.

D/C? D is clear since only write permissions allow assigning. C might work if the person has access, because a personal account alone doesn’t guarantee assign rights, but it’s more likely than just commenting or enterprise status.

Not A, because just having an enterprise account doesn’t mean you have access to that repo. D is solid since write permissions are needed to assign someone. B could work, but it’s not guaranteed.

Options B and D, they both make sense to me.