Question 1

You are reviewing the testability of your SUT. Which of the following BEST refers to the characteristic of OBSERVABILITY?

Accepted Answer

D

Explanation: Observability, a key characteristic of testability, refers to the ease with which the internal states and outputs of the System Under Test (SUT) can be seen and evaluated during testing. This includes the ability to access outputs, log files, status messages, and intermediate computational results. High observability is crucial for a Test Automation Engineer to determine whether the SUT is behaving as expected, to verify test outcomes, and to diagnose the root cause of failures efficiently. Without it, verifying the correctness of the system's internal processing becomes difficult or impossible.

Question 2

Which of the following statements BEST describe aspects of the SUT to consider when designing a TAA?

Accepted Answer

C

Explanation: The design of a Test Automation Architecture (TAA) is fundamentally driven by the characteristics of the System Under Test (SUT). A core principle of test automation is the ability of the Test Automation Solution (TAS) to interact with, control, and observe the SUT to execute test cases and verify outcomes. Therefore, for any part of the SUT that is subject to automated testing, its relevant interfaces must be controllable by the TAA. This requirement directly influences the TAA's design, dictating the necessary adapters, libraries, and communication protocols needed to establish this control. Without controllability, automated testing of those interfaces and their related functionality is not feasible.

Question 3

A regression test suite consist of 500 test cases which are all executed manually. The business case
for a pilot project is based on the adoption of test automation using a commercial tool that will
reduce the execution time by a factor of 90% for 100% of the tests in the regression test suite. The
pilot project lasted one month ( as planned) and you are currently its results. At the end of the pilot
project, 40% of the regression tests have been automated and their execution time has been reduce
by 60%.
Which of the following statements is TRUE in this scenario?

Accepted Answer

D

Explanation: The business case set an extremely ambitious target: automating 100% of a 500-test-case suite and achieving a 90% reduction in execution time within a one-month pilot. The actual results—40% automation with a 60% time reduction—demonstrate a significant gap between the goal and the outcome. This discrepancy strongly suggests the initial target was not realistic. A fundamental principle for a successful test automation pilot project is to set goals that are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART). The results indicate the "Achievable" aspect was overlooked, making the target difficult or impossible to hit within the project constraints.

Question 4

You are working on a TAS for standalone application. The automated tests are developed based on a
automation framework that allows interaction with GUI elements using on object orientated API.
The GUI elements include menus, buttons, radio buttons, text toolbars and their properties.
Whilst automating a test, you have discovered that the GUI elements of some third party
components are not identifiable by the automated tool you are using.
Which of the following is the FIRST step that you take to investigate this issue?

Accepted Answer

A

Explanation: The core issue is the test automation tool's inability to identify GUI elements from third-party components. The most logical and professional first step in investigating this is to determine the component's inherent testability. This involves checking the component's documentation or contacting the vendor directly to inquire about automation support, known issues, or required configurations. This approach targets the root cause—whether the component was designed to be automatable. It is a direct and efficient investigation into the specific technology that is failing, which is a key responsibility of a Test Automation Engineer when dealing with external dependencies.

Question 5

Consider the following example of TAS metrics. Time to execute automated tests Speed and efficiency of TAS components Which of the following statements is TRUE?

Accepted Answer

D

Explanation: TAS metrics are categorized based on whether they measure the internal quality of the Test Automation Solution (TAS) itself or the external value it provides to stakeholders. "Time to execute automated tests" (A) is an external metric. It measures the value the TAS delivers to the project, such as providing rapid feedback to developers and enabling faster release cycles. Stakeholders outside the automation team, like project managers and developers, use this metric to assess the TAS's effectiveness. "Speed and efficiency of TAS components" (B) is an internal metric. It measures the quality and performance of the constituent parts of the TAS, which is a primary concern for the Test Automation Engineer responsible for maintaining and optimizing the solution.

Question 6

Consider a SUT that small run on multiple platform during the execution of automated test runs. In
each test run an automated test suite needs to be executed, with the same version of the TAF, against
the same version of the SUT of each platform. Each platform shall have its own dedicated test
environment. Your goal is to implement a process as automated as possible ( i.e with minimal
manual intervention) that allows implementing a consistent setup of the TAS across the multiple test
environments.
Which two of the following aspects are MOST relevant for achieving your goal in this scenario?
The configuration of the TAS uses automated installation scripts
The TAF saves the logs needed to debug errors in XML format
C) Features of the TAF not used by the automated tests have been tested
D) All the automated test cases contain the expected results
E) The TAS components are under configuration management

Accepted Answer

A, E

Explanation: The primary goal is to achieve an automated and consistent setup of the Test Automation System (TAS) across multiple environments. Using automated installation scripts (A) directly addresses the need for an automated process with minimal manual intervention. Scripts ensure that the setup procedure is repeatable, fast, and less prone to human error. Placing all TAS components under configuration management (E) is crucial for consistency. It guarantees that the exact same version of the Test Automation Framework (TAF), test scripts, and configuration files are deployed to each environment, preventing discrepancies that could invalidate test results. Together, these two practices form the foundation of a robust, automated deployment strategy.

Question 7

A project consists of distributed teams working in a 24-hour environment, where activities happen
at all hours of the day. This project adopts a CI (Continuous Integration) process when developer
check-in code and consists of automated activities that include generating a build and deploying it to
a test environment. Automated integration tests are run multiple times a day. The project have asked
for a report containing the automation test results for every build, which must be available 24/7 to
the project team.
Which of the following would be the BEST way to automatically provides this report?

Accepted Answer

A

Explanation: The scenario requires a reporting solution for a distributed team in a 24/7 Continuous Integration (CI) environment. The key requirements are automated reporting for every build, 24/7 availability, and access for the entire team. Option A is the best solution. A dashboard provides a centralized, "pull-based" information radiator that is accessible anytime, which is ideal for a distributed team. Storing results without overwriting is essential in CI to track the history of build quality, identify trends, and diagnose regressions over time. This approach directly fulfills all the stated requirements in the most efficient manner.

Question 8

What is NOT a factor in considering when you are asked to ensure an effective transition from manual to automated tests?

Accepted Answer

D

Explanation: Controllability of the System Under Test (SUT) is a fundamental prerequisite for test automation, not a factor considered when selecting which existing manual tests to convert. If the SUT cannot be controlled by a test tool, then no automation is possible. Therefore, its controllability is assessed as a go/no-go condition for the entire automation effort before the process of selecting individual manual test cases begins. In contrast, factors like the complexity of a test case, its correctness, and the stability of the SUT's user interface are evaluated on a case-by-case basis to determine the feasibility, cost, and benefit of automating specific manual tests during the transition phase.

Question 9

A web application was released into production one year ago, it has regular release which follow a V-
model lifecycle and testing is well-established and fully integration into the development lifecycle.
You have been asked to implement a TAS for the regression test suite. The regression tests have been
developed via the GUI and are expected to be run at least four times a month, for each planned
release, for the whole operation solution life of the system (six years). Each screen of the GUI uses
several third-party controls which are not compatible with the existing automation solutions. The
environment for the automation will be stable, fully controllable and separated from other
environments (development, staging, production).
What could be the MOST problematic for this TAS?

Accepted Answer

D

Explanation: The scenario describes a Test Automation Solution (TAS) intended for a long operational life (six years) with frequent execution (at least four times a month). The primary technical challenge is the presence of incompatible third-party controls, which will introduce significant complexity into the automated test scripts. While this complexity is an immediate problem, the most significant long-term problem is the sustainability of the TAS. The initial complexity will lead to brittle, hard-to-maintain scripts. Over a six-year period with regular application releases, the cumulative effort and cost of maintaining these complex scripts will become the greatest threat to the success and return on investment of the entire automation project, making sustainability the most critical concern.

Question 10

You have been asked to automate a set of functional tests at system Test level via the CLI of the SUT
for the first release of a software system. The automated tests will be delivered to the learn in
change of maintenance testing, who will use them for part of the regression testing. They have the
following requirements.
1. The automated tests must be as fast and cheap to maintain as possible
2. The cost of adding new automated tests must be as low as possible
3. The automated tests must have a high level of independence from the tool itself
Which of the following scripting techniques would be MOST suitable?

Accepted Answer

D

Explanation: Structured scripting is the most suitable technique as it directly addresses all the core requirements in a foundational and efficient manner. This approach involves creating libraries of reusable functions that encapsulate the interactions with the S-U-T's Command Line Interface (CLI). This modularity directly leads to faster and cheaper maintenance (Requirement 1) and a lower cost for adding new tests (Requirement 2) because common operations are written once and reused. By centralizing the CLI commands within these functions, an abstraction layer is created, which provides a high level of independence from the specific tool or command syntax (Requirement 3). It provides the necessary benefits without the additional overhead of more complex frameworks.

Free ISTQB CTAL-TAE Actual Exam Questions