Free Authentic IAPP AIGP Actual Exam Questions - Question 2 Discussion

It’s B, because notification should follow the impact assessment completion.

Makes sense that notification happens before any harm, so A feels too late. Notifying at deployment (D) is proactive and ensures the Minister’s aware from the start. I’d go with D.

A/B? I’d rule out C since updates don’t always mean new risk. A is about harm, but B’s about completing the impact assessment, which seems like a natural checkpoint to notify the Minister before full deployment.

D imo, it makes sense to notify right at deployment to ensure early oversight. Waiting until harm happens (A) seems reactive and kind of defeats the purpose of regulation.

Maybe D is better because the Act likely wants to catch high-impact systems early, not wait for harm to happen. Waiting for material harm (A) could be too late for effective oversight.

It’s A for me. Notifying only at deployment (D) seems early if no harm is expected. The Act focuses on preventing material harm, so reporting when harm is likely makes more sense.

Yeah, I’m with you that D sounds reasonable, but I think A could also be right since it’s about material harm, which seems like a trigger for notification. Still, notifying only after harm seems late. So I’d guess D is the better fit here, notifying upfront at deployment.

Option D makes the most sense, since notification probably happens right when the system is first deployed. The other choices seem off to me. Anyone else confused by this?