Free HashiCorp Vault-Associate Actual Exam Questions - Question 10 Discussion

It’s A for me. From what I remember, the unseal process requires keys to be entered one after another on the same system. Even if the keys are held by different admins, the actual unsealing is done sequentially on one terminal. B sounds good for security but doesn’t align with how the unseal mechanism actually works, since you can’t input keys in parallel from different machines. D is definitely out because a single command with all keys isn’t usually supported. So, the simplest and most accurate choice is A—sequential input on one system.

C imo, the question mentions Shamir unseal keys, which are separate from PGP encryption. But using PGP to encrypt keys before sharing could add a layer of security. It’s not about the actual unseal process but protecting keys in transit or at rest. So maybe the focus is on securing keys, which fits C better than just who inputs them or how they’re entered. Options A and D don’t really address security properly, and B is about distribution but not encryption of the keys themselves.

Maybe D isn’t great because entering all keys at once could be unsafe if someone’s watching or if there’s a typo. Also, A sounds off since having all admins in front of one system defeats the purpose of distributing trust. So B still feels like the best to me since it spreads out the risk by having different admins input keys from separate computers, making it less likely that all keys can be compromised at once.

Makes sense to spread risk and trust, so B fits best here.

B, much safer having different admins on separate computers input keys.

Maybe D could work if you want speed, but it feels risky to put all keys in one command. B is safer since keys come from different admins on separate systems, reducing exposure.

B/D? The main goal is to keep the process secure by involving multiple admins on separate devices, so B fits best. D is risky because entering all keys at once can be a single point of failure or exposure. A is less practical since having everyone in one spot reduces security and flexibility. C doesn’t really apply here; PGP encryption isn’t part of the usual unseal key process. So B definitely seems like the right approach to distribute trust and minimize risks during unsealing.

Option B makes the most sense since it spreads the trust among admins. Doing it all in one command (D) risks exposing keys, and A feels less secure because it concentrates everything in one spot.

B vs D? D seems too risky, putting all keys in one command isn’t secure. B makes more sense for security since different admins use separate machines. A sounds off because it’s not about sequential entry from one place.