Free Google-Workspace-Administrator Actual Exam Questions - Question 4 Discussion

Question No. 4
In the years prior to your organization moving to Google Workspace, it was relatively common
practice for users to create consumer Google accounts with their corporate email address (for
example, to monitor Analytics, manage AdSense, and collaborate in Docs with other partners who
were on Google Workspace.) You were able to address active employees’ use of consumer accounts
during the rollout, and you are now concerned about blocking former employees who could
potentially still have access to those services even though they don't have access to their corporate
email account.
What should you do?
Select one option, then reveal solution.
US
MG
Mohammad G.
2026-02-19

D imo, since provisioning those accounts with Cloud Identity and disabling services is a more direct way to block access after employees leave. Relying on the transfer tool (B) assumes former users will cooperate, which might not happen. Also, option A feels off because support usually won’t manage blocking accounts like that. Cleaning up access lists (C) is useful but reactive and won’t stop former users from accessing consumer accounts tied to corporate emails. So D gives you a way to lock down those accounts even if users don’t respond.

0
SM
Shah M.
2026-02-13

Probably B since it actively tries to regain control of those unmanaged accounts.

0
SM
Shah M.
2026-02-11

A seems unlikely since Google Enterprise Support doesn’t usually handle blocking individual consumer accounts. That sounds more like something handled internally or via tools, not support.

0
AW
Ahmed W.
2026-01-21

Maybe D prevents access altogether by disabling services for ex-employees.

0
VE
Vikas E.
2026-01-16

It’s B. The Transfer Tool for Unmanaged Accounts directly targets those consumer accounts linked to your domain, making it a cleaner way to control access without messing with active licenses or support teams.

0
VE
Vikas E.
2026-01-15

Option D

0