Free Google-Workspace-Administrator Actual Exam Questions - Question 15 Discussion

Option B seems solid since it directly targets the two users and applies the exact project phrase as a search term, keeping things straightforward without unnecessary complexity.

Makes sense to keep it separate like in A since you want all emails from those users plus any mentioning the project, no overlap risks. A’s the safest bet here.

A for sure, separate holds cover both user emails and project mentions fully.

Good catch on needing two holds—one for the users and one for the project keywords separately. That way, no chance of missing emails that only mention the project but aren’t from those users. Definitely A.

It’s A because splitting the holds ensures you don’t miss emails mentioning the project from other users, plus it covers all emails from the targeted users without mixing conditions. Makes sense to keep them separate.

Option A feels right to me too. Having two separate holds makes sense—one to capture all emails from the two users, and another to catch any email mentioning “Secret Project 123” no matter who sent it. If you combine everything into one hold like in B or D, you risk missing relevant data because the search terms might not apply cleanly to both users and keywords. Also, C uses AND between users which would look for emails sent by both users together, which is impossible. So A seems like the best way to cover all bases without gaps.

D’s search terms are too broad, might pull unrelated emails.

A/B? A makes sense since it separates the user hold from the keyword hold, which feels safer. B combines users and keywords in one hold, which might skip emails from other users mentioning the project.

It’s A because you need two separate holds: one for the specific users and another for any email mentioning “Secret Project 123.” Combining them might miss some relevant emails.

Maybe B.