Free CompTIA SecurityX / CASP+ CAS-005 Actual Exam Questions - Question 2 Discussion
Due to locality and budget constraints, an organization’s satellite office has a lower bandwidth
allocation than other offices. As a result, the local securityinfrastructure staff is assessing
architectural options that will help preserve network bandwidth and increase speed to both internal
and external resources while not sacrificing threat visibility. Which of the following would be the best
option to implement?
I’m thinking B makes the most sense here. Local caching reduces repeated data transfers over the limited bandwidth link, which speeds up access to both internal and external resources without needing complex routing changes. Plus, it keeps threat visibility intact since the security team can monitor traffic locally. Options like CDN mainly help with external content and SD-WAN might be overkill or not as effective for internal resource speed in this case. So yeah, B feels like the best bet for balancing speed, bandwidth, and security visibility.
Maybe D since SD-WAN can dynamically manage bandwidth and maintain security visibility.
Option D looks promising because SD-WAN can prioritize traffic and use multiple links efficiently, which helps with bandwidth limits and still keeps security controls centralized. Unlike caching or CDN, it dynamically routes traffic based on real-time network conditions without losing threat visibility. This flexibility seems key given the diverse needs of internal and external resources from the satellite office.
Probably A since distributed connection allocation can optimize bandwidth without losing security control.
It’s B; local caching cuts bandwidth use without losing threat monitoring locally.
Maybe C makes more sense here since a CDN can reduce bandwidth usage by serving content closer to the user without losing threat visibility like caching might. It’s designed for better speed and efficiency.
B, but would local caching really keep all the security visibility intact?